AIAI Development ToolsAI AgentsBudget AILLMsLLM Comparison

Best Budget Coding LLMs 2025: DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini vs GPT Comparison

Dmytro ChabanDmytro Chaban
July 5, 202514 min read
Best Budget Coding LLMs 2025: DeepSeek R1 vs Gemini vs GPT Comparison

As many "unlimited" coding software start to shut down their "unlimited" plans, developers need cost-effective alternatives. After spending months testing and using different coding LLMs in my daily development work, this comprehensive guide compares the best budget coding LLMs in 2025, analyzing real pricing data and Aider leaderboard performance scores.

DeepSeek R1 emerges as the clear winner with a 71.4% Aider score at just $8.55/month, delivering exceptional value for AI-powered coding assistance. Through hands-on testing across 8+ models including Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude variants, and GPT models, I'll help you find the perfect coding AI assistant for your budget and needs.

TL;DR: The Best Budget Coding LLMs#

  • Best Overall Value: DeepSeek R1 delivers the most performance for its cost, with a leading Value Score of $0.12.
  • Largest Context Window: Gemini 2.5 Flash is the go-to for tasks requiring a massive 1M token context.
  • Your Ultimate Tool: Use our interactive Cost Calculator to find the perfect model based on your specific usage patterns.

Quick Comparison: Top 3 Budget Coding LLMs#

Top 3 Budget Coding LLMs - Quick Comparison

ModelContextInput PriceOutput PriceMonthly Cost*Aider ScoreValue Score ⬇️
🥇 DeepSeek R1128k$0.55/1M$2.19/1M$8.5571.4%$0.12
🥈 Gemini 2.5 Flash1M$0.50/1M$2.50/1M$9.1055.1%$0.17
🥉 DeepSeek V3128k$1.25/1M$1.25/1M$9.7555.1%$0.18
*Monthly cost based on 5.2M input + 2.6M output tokens (average active developer usage). Value Score = Monthly Cost ÷ Aider Score (lower is better)

Calculate your exact monthly costs based on your usage

Methodology#

To provide the most accurate, real-world comparison, I've grounded this analysis in both verifiable data and practical testing experience. Here's how I approached it:

  • Usage Data: The monthly cost calculations are based on a standardized developer workload of 5.2 million input tokens and 2.6 million output tokens per month. This figure represents the average usage of an active developer coding for 8 hours a day, derived from industry reports on AI tool consumption in professional environments and closely matches my own tracked usage patterns.

  • Performance Benchmarks: All performance scores are taken directly from the public Aider Leaderboard, a community-respected benchmark that measures an AI's practical coding capabilities on real-world tasks. I've validated these scores through my own testing across various coding scenarios.

  • Pricing: All prices are sourced from the official public pricing pages for each respective model as of July 2025, with costs verified through actual usage billing.

How I Choose the Right Coding LLM for My Needs#

After testing dozens of coding LLMs over the past year, I've learned that choosing the right one depends on your specific use case, budget, and performance requirements. Here's how I evaluate my needs and recommend you do the same:

When I Need High-Performance#

For complex system design, architectural decisions, or critical debugging, I reach for premium models like Claude Opus or Gemini 2.5 Pro. When I'm working on mission-critical features or need the absolute best reasoning capabilities, price becomes secondary to getting it right the first time.

My Everyday Development Workflow#

For routine coding, code reviews, bug fixes, and feature implementation, I've found mid-tier models provide excellent value. Most modern LLMs handle well-defined tasks beautifully when I give them clear instructions and proper context.

When I'm Budget-Conscious#

For learning new technologies, personal projects, or high-volume usage (like when I'm refactoring large codebases), budget models have genuinely impressed me. They've reached capability levels that would have been premium-tier just two years ago.

Key Factors to Always Consider#

Usage Patterns: This analysis uses 5.2M input and 2.6M output tokens per month, the documented average for active developers working 8 hours daily based on industry usage data. Track your actual usage for a week to establish your personal baseline.

Context Requirements: Consider whether you need large context windows (1M+ tokens) for working with entire codebases, or if smaller contexts (128k) work fine for focused tasks. Most development work fits comfortably within 128k tokens.

Performance Benchmarks: The Aider leaderboard scores measure real-world coding performance rather than theoretical benchmarks. These scores combined with official pricing data provide the most accurate value assessment.

Value Calculation: The optimal choice balances cost per performance point, maximizing coding capability within budget constraints, rather than simply choosing the cheapest or most expensive option.

Detailed Analysis: Best Value Coding LLMs#

1. DeepSeek R1 (0528) - 128k Context, $8.55 per month + Open Source#

DeepSeek R1

Developer: DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 is a large language model that can be used for coding.

Specifications

Context Size128k
Input per 1M tokens$0.55
Output per 1M tokens$2.19
Average developer's price / month$8.55
Open SourceYes
Aider Leaderboard71.4%

Leading model with excellent price-to-quality ratio and the ability to fine-tune to your own needs. The biggest drawback in 2025 is the context size. With Claude reaching 200k context size and Gemini 2.5 Pro having an impressive 1M context size, DeepSeek R1 is quite limiting. While the 128k context may seem small compared to 1M, it's important to note that for performance and cost reasons, many popular IDEs and coding assistants effectively limit their context window to a similar size during everyday use.

2. Gemini 2.5 Flash - 1M Context, $9.10 per month#

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Developer: Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash is a large language model that can be used for coding.

Specifications

Context Size1M
Input per 1M tokens$0.50
Output per 1M tokens$2.50
Average developer's price / month$9.10
Open SourceNo
Aider Leaderboard55.1%

In my testing, Gemini 2.5 Flash is slightly more expensive than DeepSeek R1, but slashes the same workload's Sonnet 4 bill by ~85%. Additionally, the 1M context size is a game changer, giving you the ability to look through whole codebases if needed. Even though it's similar in price compared to DeepSeek R1, the Aider leaderboard score is not as good, thus it takes 2nd place. Otherwise, it's a really great model for many different tasks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash stands out with better tool usage, making it easier to integrate with agents, which gives a big bonus to the model.

3. DeepSeek V3 - 1M Context, $9.75 per month#

DeepSeek V3

Developer: DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3 is a large language model optimized for coding tasks with excellent performance and competitive pricing.

Specifications

Context Size128k
Input per 1M tokens$1.25
Output per 1M tokens$1.25
Average developer's price / month$9.75
Open SourceYes
Aider Leaderboard55.1%

From my experience, DeepSeek V3 is catching up with Gemini 2.5 Flash and is a really great model for many different tasks. While the Aider score is the same, the context size is 128k. Together with higher pricing, it has the advantage of being open source.

Cost Calculator: Estimate Your Monthly LLM Expenses#

Want to see how much different LLMs would cost based on your actual usage? Use our interactive calculator below to estimate your monthly expenses. You can either select from common usage presets or enter your custom token usage.

Interactive LLM Cost Calculator

Model Category:
Usage Presets:
Input Tokens (millions/month)
Output Tokens (millions/month)
Model
Context
Monthly Cost
Aider Score
Value Rating

The calculator above shows real-time cost estimates for all major budget-friendly LLMs. It automatically sorts models by cost and includes a "Value Rating" that shows cost per Aider leaderboard point, helping you find the best price-to-performance ratio for your needs.

Key insights from the calculator:

  • Light users (1-2 hours/day): Most models cost under $5/month
  • Average developers (8 hours/day): Budget models range from $2-15/month
  • Heavy users (10+ hours/day): Costs can vary dramatically between models
  • Enterprise teams: DeepSeek models often provide the best value at scale

How to Actually Connect to These Budget LLMs#

After testing various connection methods, using an API aggregator like OpenRouter or Together AI emerges as the best approach. You get one API key to manage, and switching between models is instant with no more juggling multiple accounts and keys.

This guide focuses on OpenRouter since it's the most popular choice, but Together AI works almost identically if you prefer that platform.

Getting Started with OpenRouter#

First, grab your credentials from OpenRouter:

  1. Head to OpenRouter.ai and sign up
  2. Go to your Keys page and create a new API key (save this somewhere safe)
  3. The key details you'll need:
    • API Base URL: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1
    • DeepSeek Model Name: deepseek/deepseek-r1

Setting Up VS Code with Continue#

Continue is an excellent open-source AI coding assistant that connects to any API provider easily. Here's the setup process:

After installing the Continue extension from the VS Code Marketplace, open the config file using Ctrl+Shift+P(or Cmd-Shift-P on MacOS) and search for "Continue: Open Config File". Your configuration should look like this:

...
models:
  - name: DeepSeek (Together AI)
    provider: together
    model: deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528-tput
    defaultCompletionOptions:
      contextLength: 128000
      maxTokens: 8000
    apiKey: <TOKEN>
    roles:
      - chat
      - edit
      - apply

  - name: DeepSeek (OpenRouter)
    provider: openrouter
    model: deepseek/deepseek-r1
    apiKey: <YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY>
    apiBase: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1

Replace <TOKEN> with your Together AI API key or YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY with your OpenRouter key. The models section should contain all your configured providers.

Key configuration elements:

  • models is the top-level array containing all model configurations
  • Each model configuration starts with - name:
  • provider specifies the API service (together/openrouter)
  • defaultCompletionOptions sets token limits
  • roles defines which features to enable

Now you can select either "DeepSeek (Together AI)" or "DeepSeek (OpenRouter)" from Continue's model dropdown.

Command Line Setup with Aider#

For command-line pair programming, Aider is incredibly powerful and works seamlessly with OpenRouter. Here's the setup:

Create a config file at ~/.aider.conf.yml with this configuration:

# Use the specific model name from OpenRouter
model: deepseek/deepseek-r1

# Point to the OpenRouter API endpoint
api_base: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1

# Tell Aider where to find the key
api_key: env:OPENROUTER_API_KEY

Before running Aider, set your API key in the terminal:

export OPENROUTER_API_KEY="YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY"
aider /path/to/your/files

Automating with n8n#

For automation workflows, n8n works perfectly with its standard OpenAI node connected to OpenRouter:

  1. Add the OpenAI Chat Model node to your workflow
  2. Create a new OpenAI credential with your OpenRouter API key
  3. Set the Base URL to https://openrouter.ai/api/v1
  4. Enter the model name manually: deepseek/deepseek-r1

The beauty of this setup is that you can switch between any model on OpenRouter just by changing the model name in your configs with no need to reconfigure everything.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Budget Coding LLMs 2025 - Frequently Asked Questions

Conclusion: My Top Recommendations for 2025#

Based on my extensive testing and daily usage, start with DeepSeek R1 as it delivers the best value with a score of just $0.12 per Aider point, significantly beating Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.17) and DeepSeek V3 ($0.18). Even though Gemini is slightly cheaper monthly, DeepSeek R1's superior performance makes it the clear winner.

The "unlimited" era is over, but these budget models deliver premium-tier performance from just two years ago. Track your usage, experiment with different models, and find your perfect coding companion without breaking the bank.

What's your experience with budget coding LLMs? Share your thoughts below.